Fighter Profile

The Refinement: Islam Makhachev vs. the Khabib Standard

They are the same size, from the same gym, with the same wrestling base — 5'10", 70-inch reach, both of them. Khabib Nurmagomedov is the most destructive top-position fighter in UFC history. Islam Makhachev controls nearly as much of the fight and lands a fifth as many ground strikes. We pulled every round both men have fought to work out whether that's a downgrade or a redesign.

The Fight Algorithm2026-08-109 min read

Islam Makhachev and Khabib Nurmagomedov are, on paper, the same human being.

Both are listed at 5'10". Both have a 70-inch reach. Both came out of Dagestan, both out of the same gym, both built on the same combat-sambo wrestling base, both mentored by the same man. Khabib left the sport 13-0. Makhachev is 17-1 and holds a belt in a division above the one Khabib ruled.

The natural way to tell this story is succession — the student who inherited the throne and is now finishing what his teacher started. That version is easy and it is mostly wrong.

We pulled every round both men have fought in the UFC. On the metric that defines Khabib's career, Makhachev is not close to him. He is not even in the same postcode.

Khabib Nurmagomedov landed 29.2 significant strikes from the ground per fight — the highest figure of any fighter in UFC history with eight or more bouts. Not top ten. First, out of 803.

Islam Makhachev lands 6.3. He ranks 281st.

And he controls his opponents almost as much as Khabib did.

That is the article. Not a worse Khabib — a different answer to the same question.

I. The Khabib Standard

Khabib Is #1. Makhachev Is #284.

Significant strikes landed from the ground, per UFC fight. All 803 fighters with at least eight UFC bouts. Khabib Nurmagomedov is not merely high on this list — he is the single most destructive top-position fighter the promotion has recorded.

Khabib  Makhachev  Rest of the top 15

The gap is not subtle. Khabib landed 29.2 ground strikes a fight across thirteen fights. Makhachev lands 6.3 — about a fifth as many — while controlling almost as much of the fight.

We set this bar ourselves. In The Invisible Round we argued that control time is only worth what you do with it, and we used Khabib as the reference case: 4.0 ground strikes per minute of control, the number that separates a mauler from a man lying on someone. Above roughly 2.0, nobody questions your right to win the round. Below it, the complaints start.

Khabib clears that bar twice over. He spent 7:17 per fight in control — fifth-most in UFC history — and he used it. 380 ground strikes across thirteen fights. Against Michael Johnson he landed 88 from the top. Against Darrell Horcher, 71. Against Edson Barboza, 55.

Makhachev has landed 114 ground strikes in eighteen fights. Total. Fewer across his entire UFC career than Khabib managed in two nights.

His rate is 1.12 ground strikes per minute of control — 712th of 803. By the standard our own analysis set, Islam Makhachev is on the wrong side of the line.

He is also 17-1.

II. Same Position, Different Intent

Maulers, Holders, and Islam Makhachev

Every fighter with eight or more UFC bouts. Horizontal: minutes of control per fight. Vertical: how many ground strikes they land per minute of it. Up and to the right is a mauler; bottom-right is control without consequence.

Khabib  Makhachev  All other fighters

Both men sit far to the right — they control more than almost anyone. But Khabib sits high, in the mauler quadrant, and Makhachev sits below the line Article 9 identified as where control starts drawing complaints. He is there anyway, and he keeps winning, which is what makes him interesting.

Plot every fighter in the pool and the shape of the problem gets clear. Both men sit far to the right — they control more of the fight than almost anyone who has ever competed. But Khabib sits high in the mauler quadrant, and Makhachev sits down among fighters who accumulate position without consequence.

Those fighters usually get punished for it. They lose close decisions, they draw boos, and their records show it. Makhachev's does not.

The reason is that he isn't doing the same thing they are. A holder controls because he cannot do anything else. Makhachev controls because the control is the offence — he is hunting the neck, not the knockout. Eight of his seventeen wins are submissions, against five of Khabib's thirteen. He advances position, threatens, and takes the tap or takes the decision. The ground strikes are not missing because he can't land them. They're missing because he is doing something else with his hands.

There's a real cost to that choice and it belongs in this article: it makes for worse television, and it hands the judges a harder problem. But it also does something Khabib's version could not.

III. Eighteen Fights, One Direction

Eighteen Fights, and the Control Keeps Climbing

Every Makhachev UFC fight in order. Bars are minutes of control; the line is ground strikes landed in that fight. The control grows with the level of opponent. The damage never does.

Title fight  Other win  Loss (Martins, 2015)

The outlier: 19 minutes and 10 seconds of control against Jack Della Maddalena — 77% of a twenty-five-minute welterweight title fight, and the 14th-longest single-fight control in UFC history. He landed seven ground strikes in all of it.

Watch the control column climb. Nik Lentz in 2017: 11:53. Thiago Moises, 8:11. Dustin Poirier in a five-round title fight, 10:23. And then, in November 2025, moving up to welterweight to challenge Jack Della Maddalena for a second belt, 19 minutes and 10 seconds.

Nineteen Minutes and Ten Seconds

The most control time recorded in a single UFC fight. Makhachev's welterweight title win over Jack Della Maddalena in November 2025 ranks 14th all-time — and he landed seven ground strikes across the whole of it.

Makhachev vs Della Maddalena  Other fights

Everyone else on this list was grinding out a decision in their own division. Makhachev did it in his first fight at welterweight, against the reigning champion, for a belt.

That is 77% of a twenty-five-minute fight, and the 14th-longest single-fight control performance in UFC history. Every other name near the top of that list was grinding out a decision in their own weight class. Makhachev did it in his first fight at welterweight, against the reigning champion, for a title.

He landed seven ground strikes in the whole thing.

IV. Where the Student Is Ahead

Where the Student Is Ahead

Percentile among the 803-fighter pool, so higher is better in all three cases — including strikes absorbed, where the underlying number is one you want low. These are the metrics Makhachev owns outright.

Khabib  Makhachev

Makhachev has been taken down twice in eighteen UFC fights. Khabib, for all his offensive grappling, was taken down more often and hit more often — 1.75 significant strikes a minute against 1.45. The gap is small in absolute terms and large across a career.

Read the comparison in only one direction and it looks like decline. Read it in both and it looks like a trade.

Makhachev has been taken down twice in eighteen UFC fights — a 91.3% takedown defense that puts him 24th all-time. Khabib, for all his offensive grappling, sat at 84.6% and 62nd. Makhachev is hit less: 1.45 significant strikes absorbed per minute against Khabib's 1.75, 17th all-time against 40th. He finishes his own takedowns more efficiently, 56.2% to 48.0%, even though he attempts far fewer.

The Same Shape, Rotated

Percentile rank among all 803 fighters with eight or more UFC bouts — further out is better on every axis. Khabib owns the offensive grappling side of the shape; Makhachev owns the defensive side.

Read it as a trade rather than a ranking. Khabib bought control volume and ground damage; Makhachev bought takedown defense and a lower damage intake. Both men are in the top 4% of the division for winning — they just paid for it differently.

The radar makes the shape of it obvious. Khabib bought control volume and ground damage. Makhachev bought takedown defense and a lower damage intake. Both men are in the top 4% of the UFC for winning — Khabib tied for first all-time at 100%, Makhachev fourth at 94.4%. They simply paid for it in different currencies.

And the currency Makhachev chose is the one that travels. A style built on out-damaging people from top position needs a size and strength edge to work. A style built on denial — not being taken down, not being hit, not being moved — degrades far more gracefully when the other man is bigger. Khabib never tested that. Makhachev moved up a division and took the belt off the champion.

V. The Part Where It Might Not Work

The Question: Can He Get Him Down?

Every takedown attempted against Ian Machado Garry in the UFC, fight by fight. Red is what landed; blue is what he stuffed. Only Shavkat Rakhmonov has managed more than one.

MakhachevMachado Garry
Record (UFC)17-110-1
Height5' 10"6' 3"
Reach70"74"
StanceSouthpawOrthodox
Sig. strikes landed / min2.454.78
Sig. strikes absorbed / min1.452.86
Control per fight (min)5.642.77 against

Takedowns landed  Stuffed

Garry has been taken down 6 times on 30 attempts — 80% defense — and Belal Muhammad went 0 for 7 against him in their fight. Makhachev lands 3.1 takedowns per fifteen minutes. Something has to give.

On August 15 he defends that welterweight title against Ian Machado Garry, and this is the first opponent in years who is a genuinely awkward fit.

Garry is 6'3" with a 74-inch reach. Makhachev is giving up five inches of height and four of reach to a rangy, high-volume striker who lands 4.78 significant strikes a minute. And Garry does not get taken down: six times on thirty attempts across eleven UFC fights, an 80% defense. Only Shavkat Rakhmonov has managed more than one against him. Belal Muhammad — a career wrestler with a title reign of his own — went 0 for 7.

Makhachev lands 3.1 takedowns per fifteen minutes. That is a good number. It is not Khabib's 5.3, and it has to beat a man who has stuffed almost everything thrown at him.

Here is where we put our own money where our mouth is. Our forecast model has Makhachev at 65.2% — below the 68% bar we require to publish a pick. The market opened him at −400, an implied 80%. We are not on this fight, and the gap between our number and the market's is one of the widest on the card. The model is not convinced this is a formality, and neither are we.

VI. What He Actually Is

The succession story wants Makhachev to be Khabib with more fights. The data says he is something less romantic and more interesting: a fighter who looked at the most dominant grappling career in the sport's history, kept the part that wins, and discarded the part that entertains.

Khabib drowned people. Makhachev locks the door and waits. It is a worse highlight reel and it is a more portable style, and it is why the record now reads 17-1 across two divisions instead of 13-0 in one.

Whether it survives contact with a 6'3" striker who cannot be taken down is the question the Xfinity Mobile Arena gets to answer on Saturday.

Methodology: Data sourced from UFCStats.com, covering Islam Makhachev's complete UFC career (2015-05-23 through 2025-11-15, 18 fights) and Khabib Nurmagomedov's (2012-01-20 through 2020-10-24, 13 fights). All leaderboard ranks are computed against the 803 fighters with eight or more UFC bouts — the same pool used in The Invisible Round, so the control-time figures in the two articles are directly comparable. Control time is summed from the per-round control_time field and converted to seconds; fight time is (finish_round − 1) × 5 minutes + finish_time. Ground strikes are sig_ground_landed summed across every round. Per-minute rates use total cage time, not scheduled time. Takedown defense is one minus (opponent takedowns landed ÷ opponent takedowns attempted) across every UFC fight. Percentile ranks on the radar and the damage-taken chart are computed as 1 − (rank − 1) ÷ 803, direction-corrected so that higher is always better — including strikes absorbed, where the raw number is one you want low. The control-vs-damage scatter drops 14 fighters whose recorded control time is zero across every round (all pre-2000 bouts, where the statistic was not captured), since their strikes-per-control-minute is undefined. The 65.2% forecast figure is the production v4 model's output for UFC 330, generated before the card and hash-committed; see Inside the Model for how it is built and /predictions for the published record.